Chapter 20: Why Medical Marijuana
Prop. 215 and Prop. 64 Are Not Law
Well that should be apparent by now, but in case it isn’t, let’s sum things up.
Though the Founding Fathers, who set up this country and Constitution, were actively attempting to create a country free from Catholic and British influence and control and worked hard in the formative years to keep the British Masonic bankers out of influence and control in American affairs, the long-standing imperialism of Great Britain proved eventually to be a formidable match for American sovereignty. The Civil War ended and out of the ashes of the burning Constitution came the enthroning age of the corporation, and the biggest, most powerful one was called the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Lincoln suspended the Constitution. They killed him so they could continue the takeover. They brought in lawyers and judges who were Freemasons from England and set up the Bar.
The lawyers, through the Bar Association, after having set up shop in this country formally in 1872, brought in all sorts of laws like admiralty and equity and made the courts to hear these cases. The Federal Reserve set up shop and the corporation called the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA went bankrupt, along with it the states, and pledged all mortgages, Birth Certificates and securities as collateral against the debt in 1933. They took us off the gold standard, replacing our currency with commercial paper. Then they handed down two major decisions saying contracts are the basis for all rulings before any other laws take precedence. They also admitted that where there isn’t a contract there is no regulations over the trafficking of marijuana. So then, why isn’t Proposition 215 the law, or any medical marijuana law in any state for that matter and how does this apply to all the new states’ “legalization” efforts?
The reason for this is because as soon as you walk into the courtroom, you are presumed to be a “debtor,” and the surety for the debt of the strawman and the United States. Not only that, they have a contract with you the moment you enter the courtroom, which is “the new over-riding contract.” When you give your name, when you answer their questions, when you give them jurisdiction, when you agree to their actions, when you don’t raise any objections, when you PASS THE BAR and ENTER THE COURT, you give them jurisdiction, to a lesser or greater degree.
So, there are no laws then, is that what I’m saying? Well, kind of. Not anymore there aren’t. Not unless you are an “Employee” of the United States or State corporation or any local or municipal offices or if you are a US citizen.
Well, what about the murderers, rapists, and people who commit assaults and the like? Well, back in the old days, in the 1800’s and for a while before that, if someone was injured, then the injured party would have to put up a “bond” and that would indemnify the other party against a false action or claim. It would provide a monetary damage amount to the party that was taken to court by the litigant who didn’t really have a cause of action. In case someone made something up, they couldn’t just come and arrest you, like they do now. That person would also have to sign an affidavit under oath in front of a magistrate and that magistrate would then issue a warrant for the man to come to court to answer for the charges. He would not be arrested though, other than for the purposes of bringing him before the court for his first appearance unless he agree to be there voluntarily, in which case, no arrest would be needed.
But, nowadays, the state, or federal government is representing the “injured party” and it cannot be injured because it is only a piece of paper, a fiction. It doesn’t have feelings and cannot be hurt or injured. The problem or crime is, they don’t put up the “indemnity bond.” But they are supposed to. It is called a “surety bond,” but we will get back to that in a bit. So, since they don’t have a real cause of action, anytime you walk into their courtroom, they now have one, by establishing a new contract with you.
You are presumed to be a “debtor” because you operate in Federal Reserve notes evidenced by the money you use in your pocket and what you use to pay your fines with, and you have stepped into a “bankruptcy court,” where the only issue left to resolve is how you are going to settle the debt. What debt? Your share of the national debt, of course!
247
Well, what if you just challenge the contract? What about using the Almeida-Sanchez case to file motions, briefs, and so forth and argue the case of the facts and rulings? What did Eustace Mullins say before about “Judicial discretion,” and how they threw out everything he filed without even reading it? Where is our remedy to be obtained in the courts if they ignore all of our filings and motions and requests, and they use judge-made law, and they have what appears to be unlimited judicial immunity? What do you do when the Federal Government can say that you are not allowed to bring in any evidence that shows medical marijuana as the issue, because it is not “recognized as having accepted medical value” by the feds? The purpose of this short chapter is to show how Medical Marijuana and Proposition 215 is not really the law. How we deal with this problem will be covered in a few chapters toward the end of the book.
For now, let’s just view the issue close-up. What is the difference between a Republic and a Democracy? Let’s take a look at what the Government Manual has to say about this.
“(Government Citizenship Manual, Prepared by the ARMY – Prepared under the direction of the Chief of Staff.) DEMOCRACY & REPUBLIC DEFINED (War Department, Washington, D.C., November 30, 1928.
CITIZENSHIP
“This manual supersedes Manual of Citizenship Training The use of the publication “The Constitution of the United States,” by Harry Atwood, is by permission and courtesy of the author.
CITIZENSHIP Democracy:
“A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of “direct” expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic–negating property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demogogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
CITIZENSHIP Republic:
“Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them. Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress. Is the “standard form” of government throughout the world. A republic is a form of government under a constitution which provides for the election of
“(1) an executive and (2) a legislative body, who working together in a representative capacity, have all the power of appointment, all power of legislation, all power to raise revenue and appropriate expenditures, and are required to create (3) a judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality of their government acts and to recognize (4) certain inherent individual rights.
“Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you are drifting into democracy.
“Atwood. Superior to all others. –Autocracy declares the divine right of kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or unjustly administered. Democracy is the “direct” rule of the people and has been repeatedly tried without success. Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind, defined a representative republican form of government. They “made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy * * * and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic.”
“By order of the Secretary of War: C.P. Summerall, Major General, Chief of Staff. Official: Lutz Wahl, Major General, The Adjutant General.”
248
WHY DEMOCRACIES FAIL
“A Democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of Government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that Democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed by a Dictatorship. (Written by Professor Alexander Fraser Tytler, nearly two centuries ago while our thirteen original states were still colonies of Great Britain. At the time he was writing of the decline and fall of the Athenian Republic over two thousand years before.
“Did I say “republic?” By God, yes, I said “republic!” Long live the glorious republic of the United States of America. Damn democracy. It is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no less often by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of socialism, miscegenation, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to individuals whose virtuous principles make them offensive.” – Westbrook Pegler: New York Journal American, January 25th and 26th, 1951, under the titles- Upholds Republic of U.S. Against Phony Democracy, Democracy in the U.S. Branded Meaningless. (1)
Now, what happens when we vote? We are engaging in the corporate democracy or “corporatocracy.” When the people pass Amendments or state ballot initiatives to their state constitutions, they are not actually securing any real “rights.” They are only granting themselves corporate “privileges.” Do you understand the difference? The “right” to grow and consume and even trade in cannabis, is not a conduct “regulated” lawfully by Congress or the States, since those states are all subordinate to the federal government and they are not independently operated anymore. When we ask permission to grow cannabis and get a license, we are asking for a privilege to do something which otherwise would be legal, had we not contracted with some fictitious entity and given away by assent, our naturally god given rights.
Since cannabis was supposedly “decriminalized” or even “legalized” in California, the price dropped so low that the majority of home growers who were able to meet their financial needs previously have dropped out of the market altogether, and since that happened the corporations making the products now under heavy tax and license restrictions are keeping the prices so high, that no savings has appreciated for the average consumer, while many of the best producers have been driven out of business. Now, the prices are stabilizing and heading back up again, slightly.
The only difference is, now most of the players are heavily funded by investors with unlimited capital and there is no place for the average person to get into the market anymore. Many of the mom and pops simply folded under the financial pressure and walked away cutting their losses. So, now it’s safe for prices to get jacked up again by the corporate players. Basically, all decriminalization and Proposition 64 has done is corporatized the marketplace.
What has happened is that the corporate democracy has now taken over the cannabis trade and what was once a private business, is no longer private, but public, and we can all see the disastrous results. People are still sitting in jail with 10 and 20 year prison sentences while corporate pirates reap huge profits with new laws made just for them. This is what happens when you “vote.” The voter is voting as a US citizen in a corporate capacity ONLY, for the Democracy, which is a fiction. That is why there is no justice. Now, why would anyone want to participate in that if they knew the truth? Only foreigners would, and only they would be subject to these rules. Voting is for “corporate members” only. Are you a corporate member? I am certainly not.
(1)https://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/repvdem.htm
249
Page 250 Not Included in Free Edition – To Order the FULL Version in either Softcover or E-Book, Please Visit the Store.